| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Budget buncombe

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Friday, July 12, 2013, 8:57 p.m.

Budget buncombe

Regarding the Los Angeles Times news story “Study: Bill could slash number of illegals by half” in the July 4 print edition of the Trib: How much confidence can we have regarding the new estimate by the Congressional Budget Office that the Corker-Hoeven amendment to the vast Senate immigration bill will decrease illegal immigration by one-third to one-half instead of by 25 percent, its estimate under the original bill? Even with this revision, CBO projects 3 million to 4 million new illegal immigrants within 10 years of the bill's enactment.

The CBO sullies its credibility as a source of responsible fiscal analysis with such guessing about matters that are more the province of the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, points out that the original Senate immigration bill would actually increase the federal “on-budget” deficit by $14 billion over 10 years. Only when $211 billion in payroll taxes — which should be directed to the Social Security trust fund — were counted as extra revenue was the deficit “reduced.” But these payroll taxes are “off-budget” — money obligated for future claims on Social Security by immigrants.

We would request the Trib, in forthcoming articles, to make clear that such “unified” budget accounting procedures can be optimistically deceptive.

Alfred Doyle


Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Boot callous pols
  2. WQED beyond repair?
  3. No PSU cover-up
  4. Can’t believe ATI statements
  5. ‘Normal’ pitfalls
  6. The budget impasse
  7. The pope & child abuse
  8. Home, sweet home?