Recent action by the Pennsylvania Legislature will avoid the devastation of rural development.
Gov. Tom Corbett recently signed Act 41 of 2013, which would allow for the continued use of on-lot septic systems, providing those systems comply with state Clean Streams Law requirements. The Legislature also passed a bill addressing a potential policy change by the state Department of Environmental Protection to severely limit the use of on-lot septic systems, crippling rural development. Quite simply, the DEP proposal would have added an additional $15,000 in cost to every home built in rural Pennsylvania and killed development in much of the state.
It's clear that the Legislature and our governor understand how important home building is to the economy. Act 41 addresses the environmental impacts of on-lot septic systems and by acknowledging the systems' compliance, will save billions in additional costs to the construction industry.
Paupack, Pike County
The writer is a housing contractor and vice president of the Pennsylvania Builders Association.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.