Ellwood hospital's shame
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, July 18, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
As the only OB-GYN practicing at Ellwood City Hospital, I am angry about the way administrators decided to close the OB department (“Hundreds join petition drive to keep open maternity ward at Ellwood City Hospital,” July 7 and TribLIVE.com). They say the decision was made over a long time and after serious consideration, but their lack of action speaks louder than their words.
For example, they have not made any capital improvements to the OB unit since the 1980s, and we frequently lose patients because of this. Also, the hospital doesn't promote it; every day there's an ad from a competitor's OB unit in the local paper, but never one from ours.
They haven't tried to bring in new obstetricians and haven't negotiated for better payment from insurance companies. Most importantly, they never talked to those of us working on the unit. We have numerous ideas to improve the bottom line, but no one ever asked for our input.
The nurses, the community and I are asking the administration for a chance to make it viable. Give us two years. Work with us, not against us.
If we fail, then close the unit. But to close it without even trying is not fair to us, our patients or all those dedicated people who kept it open for the last 100 years.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’
- Ukraine & history
- Funding priorities questioned
- Proven success
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Fix icy hazard on Rt. 66
- Saved her life
- What competition?
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Keep Laurel Point