| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Ellwood hospital's shame

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Thursday, July 18, 2013, 8:55 p.m.

As the only OB-GYN practicing at Ellwood City Hospital, I am angry about the way administrators decided to close the OB department (“Hundreds join petition drive to keep open maternity ward at Ellwood City Hospital,” July 7 and They say the decision was made over a long time and after serious consideration, but their lack of action speaks louder than their words.

For example, they have not made any capital improvements to the OB unit since the 1980s, and we frequently lose patients because of this. Also, the hospital doesn't promote it; every day there's an ad from a competitor's OB unit in the local paper, but never one from ours.

They haven't tried to bring in new obstetricians and haven't negotiated for better payment from insurance companies. Most importantly, they never talked to those of us working on the unit. We have numerous ideas to improve the bottom line, but no one ever asked for our input.

The nurses, the community and I are asking the administration for a chance to make it viable. Give us two years. Work with us, not against us.

If we fail, then close the unit. But to close it without even trying is not fair to us, our patients or all those dedicated people who kept it open for the last 100 years.

Joe Ciocca


Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Can’t believe ATI statements
  2. WQED beyond repair?
  3. Updated paving needed
  4. ‘Normal’ pitfalls
  5. Pope & peace
  6. Data misrepresented
  7. The Vick ‘rub’
  8. Pipelines to the future
  9. Home, sweet home?
  10. A WQED loss