Regatta, not riot
While attending the EQT Pittsburgh Three Rivers Regatta, I got to wondering why it was necessary to have Pittsburgh police dressed in full battle gear, as though they were patrolling the streets of Kabul. Is this gear necessary to protect a bunch of yinzers on a hot, sunny day?
The image of the police, and perhaps their effectiveness, would be greatly enhanced if they were to dress normally, in short-sleeve shirts and shorts with ball caps, water bottles and radios.
Why not a less-combat-ready unit to work these kinds of community events? Surely, a more heavily armed backup team could be called upon if needed.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Misinformation persists
- Focusing on curriculum
- UMW fighting EPA regulations
- Zionist view
- Amendment levels playing field
- People’s Pledge
- Restore royalty minimum
- Incomprehensible hatred
- Unhappy returns
- Expanding their options
- Gas industry obfuscates the truth