TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Misjudging 'Gasland II'

About The Tribune-Review
The Tribune-Review can be reached via e-mail or at 412-321-6460.
Contact Us | Video | Photo Reprints

Daily Photo Galleries


By The Tribune-Review

Published: Thursday, July 18, 2013, 8:55 p.m.

I am replying to rebut Maury Fey's letter against “Gasland II” (“Gas needed, not ‘Gasland II,'” July 1 and TribLIVE.com).

First, researchers featured in the film, such as Cornell University and Stanford University professors, know something about research to determine how fracking affects the air we breathe and water we drink. Further, families that have flammable tap water know something about how toxic fracking is.

Second, Mr. Fey claims that we “need” gas. What we need is conservation and long-term sustainability. The gas will run out. Also, just like oil, fracking will leave devastation in its wake.

There are other options to our energy needs, from wind and solar to even our own excrement (no joke, see Kansas State University research). What we need is real energy independence, to put our scientists and engineers to work to incorporate true renewable energy into the grid.

Finally, just like the history of our state shows with coal, toxic fracking will create a boom and bust situation. Once the gas is gone, the damage done to the sustainable industries, from jobs linked to the food supply to jobs linked to Pennsylvania's outdoor heritage, will also be gone as the hunting, farming and tourism industries face irreparable damage.

Tess Zangrilli

Oakland

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Bloomberg & coal
  2. Knives vs. guns II
  3. Knives vs. guns I
  4. Resurrection? Yes, really
  5. Tragedy’s ramifications I
  6. Tragedy sensationalized
  7. Resurrection is real
  8. Sign on to save Springdale
  9. A medical lifeline
  10. Deer Lakes drilling OK
  11. Cover many stances
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.