By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, July 12, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
New Kensington may not have had a fireworks display, but there was no lack of illegal fireworks in the city on the Fourth of July.
It was shades of Zambelli. Fireworks were shot off in areas way too close to homes. There were loud bombs and shimmering glitter over houses.
At 10 p.m., I was walking my dog and a large volley caused the dog to go ballistic. I am in my 80s with knee and hip replacements, along with other ailments. The force of the dog pulling sent me into parked cars. Had they not been there, I could have fallen into the street and sustained major injuries.
I managed to get the dog into the house. She was shaking terribly.
The explosions went on until about 11:15 p.m. I called 911 to report this unlawful display. After police cars passed several times, the noise stopped.
I have some questions:
• Are the fireworks tents along the Tarentum Bridge and Leechburg roads licensed to sell the bombs and what amount of gunpowder can be sold?
• Isn't it still illegal to shoot loud bombs and huge sparklers 50 feet into the air, creating a fire hazard?
• Isn't it illegal to shoot them off late into the night?
• Why can't our police seize the illegal fireworks?
I spoke with several firemen at the station who said fireworks being used were definitely illegal and posed a fire hazard.
When someone approached the shooter, he said the cops wouldn't do anything.
I'm anxious to see how upcoming celebrations will be handled.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Our nation’s testing obsession
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Putin’s actions I
- Obstacles to hiring
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Math in common?
- Putin’s actions II
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- About U.S. media
- Drought answer?
- Beneficial, irreplaceable