| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Corbett & pooling

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Sunday, July 21, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

The news story “Corbett defends new drilling law” (July 11 and contains serious accusations against Gov. Corbett's support of Senate Bill 259 but omits one critical element: actual facts about the bill.

To be clear, nothing in the new law compels a landowner to permit oil or gas development, or alters the terms of an existing lease. In fact, doing so would be unconstitutional, as Corbett noted in a recent letter to the General Assembly.

Rather, the bill clarifies that existing leases — for people who already have consented to oil and gas development — may be developed more efficiently through the use of horizontal drilling. This leads to fewer well pads, fewer stream crossings, less forest fragmentation and less earth disturbance.

It is unfathomable that a self-proclaimed environmental group like PennFuture would oppose such a measure.

The story also fails to mention that SB 259 passed with overwhelming, bipartisan support — including 48-2 in the Senate — after lawmakers debated and ultimately dismissed these same claims.

SB 259 also contains significant new provisions requiring drillers to disclose information to landowners regarding their royalty payments. These much-needed provisions will help ensure that royalty owners receive the payments they are due.

Patrick Henderson


The writer is Gov. Tom Corbett's energy executive.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Pa. severance tax suffocating
  2. Pipelines to the future
  3. Where’s the anger?
  4. A WQED loss
  5. Volkswagen’s ‘sin’
  6. MLK Day represents more than one man
  7. The budget impasse
  8. Refugees ruse?
  9. Kill camera bill
  10. Photo ID?
  11. Greenwald sale