TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Defining 'marriage' III

About The Tribune-Review
The Tribune-Review can be reached via e-mail or at 412-321-6460.
Contact Us | Video | Photo Reprints

Daily Photo Galleries


By The Tribune-Review

Published: Monday, July 15, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

The editorial on same-sex marriage maintains that there is a parallel between the current marriage issue and the issue of slavery. There is no such parallel!

Today there are strong forces that have redefined marriage from the traditional meaning of being a union between a man and a woman. And they want that redefinition to be included in our laws.

When slavery was outlawed in our nation, it was not a matter of redefining it. For both sides on that issue, slavery had the same meaning, namely that some persons were the property of others, who could demand any labor from them without compensation.

Marriage cannot and should not be redefined. Other structures of cohabitations should be defined in other ways.

Hans Andrae

Jeannette

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Voting rights bill
  2. Imam’s thoughts
  3. Bloomberg & coal
  4. Ruling good for Pa.
  5. Term limits’ limits
  6. Kiski board ignores taxpayers
  7. Economics dissent
  8. Shortchanging military
  9. Sprinklers needed
  10. Resurrection? Yes, really
  11. Touching film
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.