Published: Monday, July 22, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
As a black man, I am highly offended by the assertions made by Bruce Braden in his letter “Bad laws tyranny” (July 11 and TribLIVE.com) when he compares the struggle of gay marriage to the plight of blacks in this country.
It is not a civil-rights issue or struggle. When I walk into a room, I do not have to tell people I am black; it is announced from the moment I cross the threshold. Unless one is “out of the closet,” no one can or will ever know one's sexuality. People have hidden this from friends and loved ones for years; am I able to do this?
Also, when was the last time a police officer pulled over someone who is gay and in the “wrong neighborhood”? I have been pulled over on more than one occasion for “DWB” (“driving while black”)!
Have gay people ever experienced being told they cannot eat or live somewhere or have to ride in the back of a bus? Have they had dogs and water hoses turned on them, been denied access to equal education, made to drink from a separate water fountain or use a different restroom? All of these answers are a resounding “no!”
All people should be treated with respect and not harassed for any reason; I loathe bullying of any form. But gays and lesbians do not know the pain of what I know as a person of color and what I go through every day for just being black (without having to tell anyone).
Please do not compare my pain with their pain; it is apples and oranges!
Norman F. Hargraves IV
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Choosing judges I
- Choosing judges II
- Prevailing wage downsides I
- Thanks to our veterans
- Prevailing wage downsides II
- Lies and disrespect I taught …
- About Quinn & Rose I
- Valid comparison?
- Ethanol’s benefits
- Name game
- Hero at rest