Bring back Pa. helmet law
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, July 18, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
I am begging the state Legislature and Gov. Tom Corbett to rescind Pennsylvania's no-helmet law.
Children have to wear helmets when riding bicycles and we have to wear seat belts in our cars, where we are protected by metal all around, but it's OK to not wear a helmet on a motorcycle.
Statistics show motorcycle deaths have risen in our state since the no-helmet law was enacted.
I am writing because my 20-year-old nephew was involved in a motorcycle accident recently when a deer jumped out in front of him and he crashed.
He has bad head injuries and is fighting for his life. My sister and brother-in-law have been at the hospital by his bedside since this happened.
I do not want to see any other family go through this when a mandatory helmet law could prevent a similar tragedy.
Why don't our leaders protect the citizens? Isn't that their job?
I know the governor and legislators wouldn't want their children or grandchildren riding a motorcycle without a helmet.
I know it's each person's choice whether or not to wear a helmet. But I'm also sure that young adults sometimes do not make good decisions — they think they're invincible.
My nephew's family always lectured him to wear a helmet, but unfortunately this law made it his choice.
Please re-enact the mandatory helmet law and save lives.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Knives vs. guns II
- Bloomberg & coal
- Knives vs. guns I
- Resurrection? Yes, really
- Sign on to save Springdale
- Weighty issue
- Stop currying Saudis’ favor
- Consequences in space
- Tragedy’s ramifications II
- Resurrection? Really?