Rock business disrupts neighborhood
Re. the story “Shale excavation operation OK'd in Buffalo Township” (July 11): As a resident of Edgewood Drive in Buffalo living across from Holbein's Inc. on Route 356, I see and hear everything that's done — loading and unloading, the beeping of the trucks, etc. Now we'll have more disturbance because Holbein's will be selling this rock.
Not many people from my neighborhood went to the supervisors meeting in which this was pushed through. Some, like me, have jobs or other duties that kept them from attending.
It is shameful that the township would even consider letting this kind of thing happen right in my front yard. It's bad enough the property is zoned commercial and opening the door to the concrete jungle. Now the beauty of Little Buffalo Creek is at stake and so is the serenity of my neighborhood.
Since the meeting, I have networked with residents and have started a petition to present to the township, Holbein and the Department of Environmental Protection, which must also provide the company a permit. I am fully confident I can get signatures from each household.
Too often the voices of the people are not heard, and the local governments blatantly misrepresent the people.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘PC’ Ebola approach deadly
- Behind tax inversions
- Find hilarity in the headlines
- Opposed to efficiency?
- Vandergrift killing Olmsted’s vision
- Export more oil
- Sheetz-CVS hearing
- Ride-sharing’s advantages
- Office or ‘hospital clinic’?
- Not for expressway
- Better choice