Share This Page

Downtown defaced

| Saturday, July 20, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Architecture columnist John Conti's Living-section critique of the egoistic practice of abusing Pittsburgh landmark buildings with corporate logos, “Downtown landmarks shouldn't be tagged by corporate graffiti artists” (July 14 and TribLIVE.com), is spot on in my view. Perhaps the herd will follow the first to show leadership by pulling down the defacements.

I saw a movie recently shot in Pittsburgh and was proud of the architecturally attractive lines. One can only imagine how the director had to spend hours finding panoramic views that weren't interrupted with the corporate blight scrawled on so many building facades.

Count me among those interested in signing off.

Joel Cagwin

Franklin Park

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.