Fix the TV Magazine
Fix the TV Magazine
I held off writing this letter for one week thinking maybe you had some temporary problem with your printing equipment. But no, Sunday's cumbersome, untidy copy indicates that you must be doing it on purpose.
Someone in your organization really hates TV Magazine. I am thinking that the eventual objective is the elimination of the publication. The decision six years ago to abandon publication (later rescinded) has been replaced by a slow death by erosion in quantity and quality. We now have microscopic print, a one-page summary of the weekly daylight programs, complete elimination of cable news programming, an out-of-date Channel Guide, etc.
We have a combination with the comics and a further six-page loss in the TV portion. Plus, it is very obvious that the comics have been given priority in what appears to be a format misfit. It is now a bunch of untidy pages, not a magazine. It would be great to have TV Magazine restored to the excellence it once was.
Stuart L. Ames
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Figures conflict
- Today’s big lie
- Fair pay for hard work
- More simply put
- Puzzling trend
- Finally, like Bush
- Conservatives, back Corbett
- NFL rotten apples
- HB 1722 subjective
- Wrong then & now
- Rethink NFL fandom