By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, Aug. 10, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
George Zimmerman has been found not guilty of killing Trayvon Martin. The jury decided correctly.
Zimmerman was defending himself against an almost 6-foot-tall 17-year-old, who was hardly a child. Trayvon attacked Zimmerman, broke his nose and was on top of him. Trayvon pounded the back of Zimmerman's head repeatedly on the sidewalk. Zimmerman had a gun, which he used in self-defense. He fired one time and Trayvon was dead.
Zimmerman considers himself a Hispanic. Trayvon was a black teenager. This will cause Obama problems.
Blacks consider this verdict a travesty of justice. They want the federal government to try Zimmerman on a trumped-up civil rights charge. If the Obama administration doesn't, perhaps blacks will become so angry that they won't vote for Democrats in the 2014 midterm elections.
If the federal government goes after Zimmerman, the Hispanics will be upset. They may not vote for Democrats in the next election. Obama needs their votes to win congressional seats.
Obama is between a rock and a hard place. He risks political damage either way. And I love to see him squirm.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Islam & women
- Corbett’s choice
- Invest in pre-K
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Medicaid’s future
- Slots & property taxes
- Springdale’s dysfunction