Planning to fail
Planning to fail
The thrill of victory; the agony of defeat.
Unfortunately, the recent action taken by the Leechburg School Board has taken away the first part of this adage from the Leechburg teams of the future. More unfortunately, the second part will indeed be assured.
Evidently, the people in favor of remaining in the WPIAL have never played on a winning team.
I was a member of the Leechburg football teams of 1949, 1950 and 1951, whose three-year record was 27–2. We knew the thrill of victory and enjoyed the overwhelming turnout of students who wanted to be a part of a winning team.
The biggest difference between 1950 and now? An even field of opponents.
Our teams must get on a level playing field with their opponents or they will never feel the thrill of victory.
Charles G. Camp
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pedro must go
- Duty to disclose
- Steel at stake, too
- Not taxpayers’ responsibility
- Reverse red-kettle ban II
- Oberdorf firing
- Beware this Wolf I
- Reverse red-kettle ban I
- Good riddance
- PETA & its tactics II
- Lawsuit: Publicity stunt