Don't fan the flames
I would like to start out by stating that a death of any young person is a terrible tragedy.
The George Zimmerman-Trayvon Martin situation has been fueling the fires of hate and strained race relations in our country, especially in the media and from high-profile black leaders. The verdict is now in and George Zimmerman was found not guilty by a jury of his peers.
This is the system and values our country has been built on and the foundation that makes our country a great place to live. This should be the end of a terrible situation for both families, and George Zimmerman should be free to go on with his life.
But it seems this is just the beginning for some — up to the president of the United States, Attorney General Eric Holder and Al Sharpton, who keeps fanning the flames of hate and discontent.
The president said early on, “If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon.” The president also said, “Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago.”
Watch the news in any city in the United States to see the number of young people killed every day. Sadly, many of these are young blacks killing young blacks. What action is taken to stop these senseless killings?
We need to get our priorities in order. Race relations between whites and blacks have improved over the years. Are we now going to let a few high-profile people erase all the progress we have made?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Why the difference?
- Arnold must cut police force
- No ‘pass’ for Obama
- Pa.’s ‘safety laws’
- Right to veto
- Kill ‘Lio’