TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Rebutting Ghubril

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Thursday, July 25, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
 

In his column “In rebuttal: Jake Haulk singing the same old song” (July 25 and TribLIVE.com), a rebuttal to my column “Struggling Promise” (July 21 and TribLIVE.com), Saleem Ghubril failed to make an even modestly convincing case that the Pittsburgh Promise is not a failure.

The stated goals of handing out generous scholarships to graduates were to boost enrollment and raise academic achievement. He admits the numbers on both counts are not moving in the right direction.

Pittsburgh Public Schools spends $21,000 per pupil each year. And yet many schools are educational disasters.

But his really stunning implication is that if taxpayers and contributors will just throw more money at the problem, it will get solved. Evidently, experience is not seen as a good teacher.

Mr. Ghubril chastises me for suggesting that a portion of the Promise money would be better used to create scholarships to allow some students an opportunity to get out of the Pittsburgh schools and into private or parochial schools.

My response: How many students who would love a chance to go to a school where learning is prized, discipline maintained and education actually happens are being deprived of that opportunity because he wants to take his needle and thread (money) and try to patch up the holes in the failing public schools?

A better metaphor is the Dutch boy trying to plug holes in the dike. The holes are too many and too big.

Ghubril does not address the horrendous absenteeism in the high schools. Nor does he explain why students with weak academic records can qualify for scholarships.

Set higher standards if you want to see academic improvement.

Jake Haulk

The writer is president of the Allegheny Institute for Public Policy.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Help retired horses
  2. Shame on Pitt
  3. Hold the bacon
  4. PAT & RIDC
  5. NK-A, Arnold have problems
  6. Government, media & left
  7. ATI doesn’t tell whole story
  8. Local cops cost
  9. Redoing ‘green’ math
  10. In depth: All-star medical team saved marathoner son
  11. Why they sacrificed