Share This Page

Leftist hypocrisy

| Thursday, Aug. 1, 2013, 8:55 p.m.

Leftist hypocrisy

About the hypocrisy of the left: On one hand, you have the surviving alleged Boston bomber on the cover of Rolling Stone magazine; its headline might as well have been, ”Give him a break. He was just the victim of his family's beliefs.” Besides, he's so cute!

On the other hand, you have George Zimmerman portrayed as a monster who profiled an unarmed child just trying to get home with Skittles. Though Zimmerman was found not guilty in a court of law, he is villainized and called a murderer.

I can't help but think of the phrase, “Give us Barabbas!” Now, I'm not trying to compare Zimmerman to Jesus, but Jesus was brought to trial on trumped-up charges. Even though Pontius Pilate could “find no fault in this man,” Jesus was politically scorned, beaten, ridiculed and crucified. The crowd chose Barabbas.

Like Jesus, Zimmerman is a sacrificial lamb for the political left. While his trial was going on, 61 black males (men, boys) were gunned down in Chicago alone. We'll never know their names because their lives are not politically advantageous. These crimes don't fit into the narrative of the left.

God bless America!

MarJean Miller

Turtle Creek

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.