Say 'No' to Common Core
Published: Friday, Aug. 2, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
I am a Pennsylvania resident, wife, parent, grandparent and a retired high school teacher, having taught 38 years in Pennsylvania schools.
A couple of weeks ago I attended a meeting about the Common Core Education Standards sponsored by the Indiana-Armstrong Patriots. Peg Luksik spoke on the topic. Luksik has read and studied both the national and state standards and found them to be exactly the same — just in a different order. Being an educator, I found this to be a very interesting topic since we already have standards in place and our current textbooks address these standards.
Here are some points I would like to make about Common Core National and State Standards:
1. Are they needed? Standards are already in place.
2. Shouldn't the school districts (school boards, educators, parents, residents) be in control?
3. Before putting “tons” of money into this, shouldn't there be a pilot program?
4. When standardized tests are given, valuable instruction time is lost. I understand that there need to be evaluations but not weeks at a time.
5. Common Core wants to track students from the time they enter school until they are in a career. Isn't this “Big Brother”?
6. Teachers have 180 days to teach. They must get their subject material taught, practiced and reviewed for the “test.” But ... some students do not perform well on tests, some students cannot master the material, some students do not care about the tests, and some students are special needs students and will not do well on any test.
7. Ask your congressional representative, governor: Can you vote on standards that you have not read and studied?
8. Can we state residents afford their implementation? Common Core Standards implementation costs over the next several years in Pennsylvania will be textbook and materials, $115 million; technology, $280 million; professional development, $250 million, for a total of $645 million.
Contact your representative and the governor and say no to Common Core Standards.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Forcing their beliefs
- Nukes, not hoops
- Valid comparison?
- Fearful homogenization
- Fuel tax increase
- Eagles’ plight
- Promotion questionable
- Privatization disastrous
- Democratic Party’s union wing
- Forgetting troops
- Obama caught in more lies