Helmet law II
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, Aug. 17, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
As a follow-up to my letter, “Bring back Pa. helmet law” (July 18), I want people to know I started a petition on change.org. The petition has garnered 3,700 signatures.
Helmets save lives. When my nephew recently crashed his motorcycle, all he sustained were head injuries — no broken bones or internal injuries. Had he been wearing a helmet, it would have saved him from those injuries.
The no-helmet law creates a burden on families in the aftermath of accidents. It places a financial burden on the government, as most people who sustain these injuries are unable to pay for their medical care, so we tax-paying citizens bear the medical costs. Some are disabled for life, ending up on Social Security, Medicare or welfare.
And when a biker dies in an accident, we pay for that person's children via Social Security or welfare — another huge burden on our system.
I know most bikers disagree, but they need to realize that wearing a helmet will save their lives or prevent serious head injuries.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Corbett’s choice
- Invest in pre-K
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Islam & women
- Slots & property taxes
- Medicaid’s future
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Putin’s actions I
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Obstacles to hiring
- Conspicuous by absence