Meeting growing need
Published: Thursday, Aug. 15, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Meeting growing need
Like all human-services agencies in Pennsylvania, Glade Run Lutheran Services has been closely following the state budget process. As the leader of a $24 million nonprofit, I empathize with our legislators' challenge to create a balanced budget that will please all constituents and provide for Pennsylvania's vulnerable.
We commend Gov. Corbett for his commitment to human services and our state's vulnerable — particularly with support in Pennsylvania's budget for individuals with autism and other developmental disabilities.
We are pleased to share Glade Run's tentative plans for two unique projects that will transform our 160-year-old campus to expand services to the region's autism community. These include a unique Sensory House Museum and Jeremiah Village, a transformational residential option for adults with autism as well as neuro-normal individuals and families.
Investments in the welfare of individuals with developmental disabilities will help these projects become a reality. We are grateful that our governor recognizes the growing need for services for individuals with autism and other developmental disabilities and look forward to sharing our progress with the region.
Charles T. Lockwood
The writer is president and CEO of Glade Run Lutheran Services (gladerun.org) in Zelienople.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Prevailing wage downsides II
- Prevailing wage downsides I
- Hero at rest
- Lies and disrespect I taught …
- Forcing their beliefs
- Valid comparison?
- About Quinn & Rose I
- Promotion questionable
- Forgetting troops
- Christians must vote
- Legacy: All lose