Fab Four forever
Fab Four forever
Justin Moyer's column “It's time to let The Beatles be” (July 28 and TribLIVE.com) fails to understand why the culture is stuck in a Fab Four rut. The answer is simple: love. We baby boomers love our Beatles. While many other groups were equally as good and possibly at times even better, no one holds affection like the Fab Four.
Those of us old enough to have experienced Beatlemania from the beginning were not just teens exposed to a great group with great records, but actually saw firsthand the Hiroshima bomb of pop music and culture. The Beatles captured our hearts and imaginations, and yes, those waves crashed over us and are still crashing to this day.
Moyers states that the Fab Four “just weren't built for these times.” I had a young co-worker who loved The Beatles. Her favorite song was “Day Tripper.” She was born in 1982, 17 years after the song was released. I don't believe this is an uncommon experience for many of the younger fans. After five decades, it's time to let The Beatles go? I say, what's the rush?
Gary R. Grande
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Won’t stop drilling
- Opposed to efficiency?
- Ride-sharing’s advantages
- Echoing Pelosi
- Vandergrift killing Olmsted’s vision
- Far-left continuation
- Export more oil
- Taiwan & Hong Kong
- Corbett respects women
- Sheetz-CVS hearing
- GCC 19, sportsmanship 0