Catholic schools & Common Core
More than 100 Catholic dioceses across the country, including the Diocese of Pittsburgh, have adopted Common Core education standards. Some are beginning to use the Common Core Catholic Identity Initiative (CCCII) — the Catholic version of Common Core.
Proponents of CCCII say they're “getting on board” because textbooks, testing, assessments and teacher training are aligning with Common Core. This means the role of the Catholic school is cast aside for educational fads and pedagogical theories. Common Core could be the demise of Catholic schools, and I wonder if that is the intention.
It is confounding that Catholic schools, with so many decades of proven success, would adopt this experimental and unproven approach to teaching and learning.
CCCII contains a massive amount of materials and detailed teaching guidelines that use behavioral psychology methods and philosophies nearly identical to outcome-based education models that were broadly defeated in the 1990s. They include weeks of unit content by grade — including book lists for first grade that contain books referencing same-sex marriage and website links and books promoting social activism and the questioning of parental authority.
CCCII's resources distort the church's teachings on social justice. These “Catholic” materials will confuse children, teachers and parents about true Catholic teachings. Parents should be very judicious and diligent in reviewing their children's school materials and activities — something they probably never imagined when sending their children to a parochial school.
Look for some of the buzzwords — excellence, 21st-century skills, digital learning, rigor, relevance, outcomes. If you see those, it means Common Core is at or coming to your school.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Appalling advice
- LCB: Asset to modernize
- Wrong on immigration I
- Wrong on immigration II
- A buck to pass?
- ‘Affordable’? Not for him
- PNC: New roles for helpers
- ATI’s broken promises
- Incumbents’ edge?
- Charge, don’t fine
- Protesters not law-abiding