Parents best hope
In his letter “Teachers best hope” (Aug. 7 and TribLIVE.com), the Rev. Paul Johnston adopts the narrow view that “(f)inding and keeping top teachers is our best hope for the success of all students.” No, sir, it is not.
While having the best teachers is certainly a component in providing a stellar education, it will mean nothing if children do not come to the classroom ready and eager to learn, the product of having been nurtured and tutored by responsible, involved parents.
We are living in an era of family breakdown; huge numbers of children born out of wedlock, into poverty and/or ignorance; and homes in which parents are not invested in preparing the child for school. When more children are raised by role-model parents who lead by example in the area of education, we will have a student body that is top-notch.
I wish I could say that I see that day on the horizon.
Oren M. Spiegler
Upper St. Clair
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Oberdorf firing
- Pedro must go
- Steel at stake, too
- Duty to disclose
- Reverse red-kettle ban I
- Not taxpayers’ responsibility
- Reverse red-kettle ban II
- Valid complaints