Good for steel, good for all
The U.S. steel industry is the solutions provider for energy development, as the pipe and tube products that steelmakers produce are integral to the exploration, production and transmission of natural gas and oil. Despite our world-leading levels of energy efficiency, the steel industry consumes substantial amounts of energy each year.
Domestic steel manufacturers, including many in Pennsylvania, face challenges on the energy front. We are subject to intense international competition, often against industry in countries where energy costs are subsidized. Regulatory policies enacted on energy providers raise costs for steel companies and threaten our competitiveness.
Congress must craft a national energy policy that ensures low costs for domestic manufacturers and allows the steel industry to maximize productivity and international competitiveness.
Congress can accomplish this by fully developing domestic natural gas, oil, coal and nuclear power; ensuring that federal regulations do not unilaterally raise the cost of domestic energy sources; harnessing the benefits of natural gas from shale formations; and approving the Keystone XL pipeline.
Development of these resources means greater demand for steel. That translates into more jobs in Pennsylvania, and that's good for everyone.
Thomas J. Gibson
The writer is president of the American Iron and Steel Institute (steel.org).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Affordable’? Not for him
- Arnold’s garbage
- Pass GMO label bill
- ATI’s broken promises
- Wrong on immigration I
- Right on race
- Report reactions III
- Protesters not law-abiding
- Library funds
- Thinly veiled disdain
- A buck to pass?