Horse seizure case smells
Re. the story “Horse seizure charges withdrawn” (Aug. 8): With all due respect to Butler County District Attorney Richard Goldinger, something more than just the horse manure smells in this case.
I have seen the photos of these horses from the Equine Angels website. The horses in the “before” photos — taken when they arrived at Equine Angels — look rather ragged. The “after” photos show healthy-looking animals.
The DA says that photographs are not enough evidence and wouldn't overcome “reasonable doubt” at trial. If these photos were of a child, would he say the same thing? I think not. If he did, both he and the child's caregivers would be labeled monsters. So why is Goldinger not standing up for those that cannot speak for themselves?
I have been involved in rescuing abused horses. I can guarantee that animals don't look like that if they're neglected/not fed for a day or two.
This is a long-term pattern of neglect. These owners shouldn't get their animals back.
Patricia A. Milligan
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.