What a town!
Published: Monday, Aug. 19, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
I am a retiree who moved to South Carolina after living in Pittsburgh for 30 years and traveling there since 1961.
I've had a lot of great experiences where the goodness of the people of Pittsburgh has shown itself. On Aug. 9, it showed itself again.
My wife and I, with two close friends from the South Hills, spent a good part of the day in the Strip — Wholey's, Pennsylvania Macaroni Co., La Prima, etc. I also had to stop in Sam Bok to buy some Asian staples we like.
After driving to our daughter's home in Sewickley, I discovered my wallet — with many credit cards, licences and cash — was missing.
It was rush hour but we still drove back to the Strip, realizing that in many cities it would be a futile effort, but in Pittsburgh, I had hope.
The stores were closing and had not seen the wallet — except for Sam Bok!
The little lady who barbecues outside got excited when she recognized me and called her lady manager, who was even more excited.
They had found the wallet and called the police at the Hill District station, who had picked up the wallet 40 minutes before.
The lady called the station, where a sergeant said, “Stay right there. We'll bring it down to you.”
And so they did. One of Pittsburgh's young finest handed me my wallet, which I had almost given up on as lost — but not quite, knowing Pittsburgh.
All the shopkeepers and the officer on duty in the Strip showed concern and willingness to help throughout my search. What a town!
Thanks, Pittsburgh. God bless yinz!
Pawleys Island, S.C.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Hunt where the deer are
- Handled it well
- ACA deserves support
- Harming, not improving
- Remember Pearl Harbor
- About time for Gilpin
- Fuel tax increase
- Us & them
- Zubik is right
- ObamaCare Obamination
- ‘Knockout’ evil