Re. the story “Lawmakers soak $1.3 million in per diems” (Aug. 11): The Pennsylvania legislators' per-diem program pays them for food and housing when away from home, plus they're paid big salaries and get cars and other perks.
As this story pointed out, that's not enough. They kick their taxpayer bosses in the teeth by charging us for food and housing when the Legislature is not in session.
When is all of this going to stop at the state and federal levels?
We need to find ways to make these lawmakers more accountable. They are cutting important programs for education, the elderly and other social services.
With that happening, it makes the dishonesty in the state Capitol even worse. They should all be ashamed.
I'll bet if there were a taxpayer revolt, these guys might wake up a little and get the message.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Food fight’ lamentable
- Biased? Guilty as charged
- It’s not personal
- Cockpit safety stalled
- Seeking Christ in kids
- More than one hero
- Aiding our enemies
- Diplomatic difference
- Expecting we’ll pay
- Unhappy returns