Zoo, dogs blameless
As a frequent visitor to the Pittsburgh Zoo & PPG Aquarium, I was outraged to hear that the parents of Maddox Derkosh are still trying to blame the zoo for the death of their son. While no child-neglect laws were mentioned in the news story “Records at issue in Pittsburgh Zoo death suit” (Aug. 6 and TribLIVE.com), child neglect was the case in the death of the young boy.
You cannot blame the African painted dogs for what they did. They are wild animals; it is in their nature to hunt and kill for their food. The viewing platform that the boy fell from is also where the dogs were fed from on a daily basis.
According to Barbara Baker, zoo president and CEO, the African painted dog exhibit had been inspected many times, for safety and for the welfare of the animals, over the past six years. The zoo passed all inspections.
It is very sad that a tragedy like this happened. It is also very sad to have members of one of the most beautiful and endangered species taken from the zoo for something that was not even their fault.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Atheists & religious expression
- Article painted wrong picture
- Resigning right thing
- Show appreciation
- Thomas’ ‘humanity’
- Pols’ real interest
- ‘Trust’ in God
- Fitz draws ire
- Mitochondrial disease awareness