Defending the 2nd I
Published: Thursday, Aug. 22, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
I have to ask Andrew Gerenyi, author of the letter “Abolish the 2nd” (Aug. 14 and TribLIVE.com), if he scribed his protest against the “obsolete” Second Amendment with quill and ink. After all, the Framers did not have laptops and spellcheck in their day, either.
If Gerenyi was so inspired to write about the George Zimmerman case, tried in our courts, which also were founded long before any of us were born, please explain why there were no powdered wigs to be seen in the extensive coverage.
Speaking of which, I have never seen a town crier roaming the downtown streets of Greensburg announcing the latest news. Just how did Gerenyi come to know about this landmark trial in a colony so far from our own?
Since his letter was printed long after this case was decided, I can only assume he traveled from Florida by oxen, as a horse-drawn carriage would have been here within a week after the trial.
If he wishes to reside where there is no fear of constitutional rights and those darn pesky amendments, he is free to move. I hear Somalia is nice this time of year.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Nukes, not hoops
- Forcing their beliefs
- Fearful homogenization
- Valid comparison?
- Fuel tax increase
- ‘Knockout’ evil
- Name game
- Legacy: All lose
- Us & them
- Leave economy alone
- Privatization disastrous