Taxpayers want informed consent before school properties are fracked. Taxpayers own the schools and support them through school taxes.
Decision-making regarding any unhealthy activity should be public:
• When were public hearings conducted regarding fracking?
• How many nationally recognized health care experts came to town to educate the public?
• How many speakers came from communities with years of experience dealing with fracking?
• Where is the public health literature on fracking?
• How many newspaper articles outlining the risks to the public were published and posted for review?
Did every taxpayer know in advance the basic facts:
1. The Marcellus shale layer is radioactive and not just ‘brine.'
2. Each drill site can release radon and radioactive alpha particles.
3. Drill cuttings and backflow are hazardous waste.
4. Methane migration into water sources near drilling is common.
5. Methane is odorless, colorless, invisible and highly explosive.
6. Fracking fluids are often toxic chemicals.
7. Fracking fluids cannot be retrieved or neutralized.
8. On average, 3 million to 7 million gallons of water, 1 million pounds of silica sand and tons of chemicals for drilling and fracking each well are used and must be disposed of afterwards.
9. Old gas wells and water wells are especially vulnerable to dangerous backflow during drilling and fracking.
Please consider the risks, not just the money. Ask the questions.
Look up your federal Environmental Protection Agency Safe Drinking Water Information System report.
Read the research on risks to students near drilling/fracking sites.
Money now may not cover the long-term costs.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.