Where's the pride, Arnold?
The city of Arnold's motto is “A Proud City of Proud People.” Really?
If they are so proud, then why would people let their properties get so out of control?
Why are our alleys so congested with debris, grapevines, weeds, shrubs and plain old junk? You can't even drive down some of our alleys without getting your car scratched or hitting debris.
Where, proud people, is that pride?
Your house and the area behind it are your responsibility to keep properly maintained. I'm not seeing it in these alleys, especially Equator, Vine and Proctor.
Would it hurt any of the homeowners — or their renters — to take ownership in these properties and clean them up? My answer is no. I work hard to keep my property clean, free of debris and unobstructed from bushes, vines and junk. It is called curb appeal.
I worry about our police officers who may have to chase after a suspect down one of those alleys. A suspect could hide in the massive jungle in some of those places and the officer could get jumped or worse.
Police Chief Willie Weber and his officers do a good job. I would hate to see any of them get hurt because of all this junk.
So, residents of Arnold, don't you think it's time to clean up your messes? Let's once again make Arnold a “City of Proud People.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- White House not playing to win
- An Obama clone
- Good ‘friends,’ good food
- U.S. Steel worthy of grant
- Unworthy of high office
- Better in long run
- Write-in alternative
- Hospital’s hero & more
- Farewell, my Springdale
- Behind tax inversions
- ‘PC’ Ebola approach deadly