First in Pittsburgh
The news story “Radioactive ‘seeds' help locate small breast tumors” (Aug. 12 and TribLIVE.com) highlights an important advance in breast surgery. However, it omits the history of how this procedure was brought to Pittsburgh.
Radioactive seed localization was first brought to Pittsburgh by a multidisciplinary team of physician-researchers and surgeons from the Comprehensive Breast Cancer Program at Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC. Since 2011, over 1,600 such procedures have been performed at Magee locations.
Our surgical oncologists have held conversations with insurers about the patient benefits. This cutting-edge procedure quickly became our standard of care, based on our research demonstrating success comparable to traditional wire localization. Additional research has shown less patient discomfort with the seed procedure.
We applaud the Trib's interest in breast care advances and want to make sure its readership and potential breast-surgery patients are aware of the depth of expertise here at Magee.
Gretchen Ahrendt, Jules Sumkin & Marguerite Bonaventura
The writers, all physicians, are, respectively, co-director of the Comprehensive Breast Cancer Program, chief of radiology and breast surgical oncologist at Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Reverse red-kettle ban I
- Good riddance
- Reverse red-kettle ban II
- Not taxpayers’ responsibility
- Idea for casino
- Punishment pushback I
- Framers’ understanding
- Incomprehensible? That’s Obama
- Punishment pushback II
- Don’t blame bus drivers I
- Don’t blame bus drivers II