Killing jobs, not creating them
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Tuesday, Aug. 27, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
I'm writing about state Rep. Daryl Metcalfe's letter “Taking care of business” (Aug. 4), in which he discussed Gov. Tom Corbett saying Mr. Metcalfe should worry about his own business, not the governor's.
I say Gov. Corbett should take care of his own business and start being forthright with the citizens.
When he campaigned, he was all about creating jobs.
But once he got in office, he and Rep. Mike Turzai spent their time trying to privatize the state stores. That would've eliminated about 5,000 good-paying jobs. That's killing jobs, not creating them.
Earlier this month, the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board reported revenue of $2.17 billion for 2012-13, a 4.59 percent increase from 2011-12. Net income is up by 24 percent from 2012 to $128 million. Of the net, $24 million went to the state police for enforcement of liquor laws; Philadelphia and Allegheny counties got $8 million.
Does this sound like the people are unhappy with the state store system? Are the people demanding it be privatized?
Now Corbett wants to add 28 cents of taxes on a gallon of gas.
How is this thinking about jobs? How is this helping the working class?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Proven success
- Enslaving themselves
- Funding priorities questioned
- Ukraine & history