Private-sector cure I
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Aug. 29, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Am I alone in standing to defend private health-insurance companies? They're getting a bad rap.
The product they sell is risk management. Yet the government prohibits companies from managing copays, deductibles, lifetime maximums, the definition of “child,” premiums, profits and pre-existing conditions.
Has anyone heard of adverse selection? Try buying auto insurance to cover your expenses after you wreck your car.
The result of these crippling regulations cannot be called insurance; it's redistribution of wealth. Is it any wonder that some insurance companies are opting out of some ObamaCare exchanges?
President Obama says that “health insurance isn't a privilege — it is your right.” Where in the Constitution does it say that? Besides, universal access to a health insurance card does not guarantee quality health care .
Anyone who believes that profit is evil might as well live in the old Soviet Union or Cuba. How did “free” health insurance work out for people there?
Carol McPeak Brinjak
The writer, a certified employee benefits specialist, is a former Reed Smith benefits manager.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Ukraine & history
- Funding priorities questioned
- Proven success
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’
- We pay to keep poor warm
- Conspicuous by absence
- Behavior counts
- Guzzardi for guv