TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Not same as marriage

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Monday, Sept. 2, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
 

Not same as marriage

In her letter “Same-sex, same as you” (Aug. 22 and TribLIVE.com), Cathy Brennan cites superficial aspects of her life with her partner — paying taxes, mourning loved ones, celebrating anniversaries — and argues from that premise that Pennsylvania law should recognize her relationship as marriage. Certainly Ms. Brennan and her partner should be treated with love and dignity. But their relationship is not the same as a marriage.

Marriage exists because of the complementarity of opposite sexes, because that complementarity begets children, and because a civilized society wants to bind children to their natural parents. Same-sex unions do not beget children, and if they acquire children, they separate children from one or both of the natural parents.

Yes, there are childless heterosexual married couples, and yes, sometimes they adopt. But those are the exceptions, and those exceptions do not overcome the fundamental conjugal roots of marriage. Marriage exists for the children, not for the adults.

Brad Tupi

Upper St. Clair

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Obama’s legacy
  2. Be fiscal stewards
  3. Thanks to Cookies
  4. Henry L. Molinaro, R.I.P.
  5. Wolf an ideologue
  6. Protecting taxpayers
  7. Piling on Hempfield
  8. Divestment & climate change
  9. ‘Peer review’ missed mark
  10. Training for what?