| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Fast-food folly

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Sunday, Sept. 15, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

I love boycotts. For political reasons, I'll boycott any movie that has Jane Fonda portraying Nancy Reagan or any store that refuses to use “Merry Christmas” in advertisements in December.

But I hear that employees of fast-food businesses have been boycotting their employers. Their justification? Corporate employees are making high salaries.

Employees were given, by the taxpayers, approximately $150,000 for 12 years of education so they could acquire good-paying jobs when they became adults. Fast-food jobs are low-skilled jobs that require little training, responsibility and education.

The law does not prohibit any of these employees from acquiring jobs as corporate employees, if they want to follow the job requirements and put in the years of effort required to obtain these positions.

So I ask these employees, “Where's the beef” of your argument?

Fast-food businesses prosper not because of fast food, but because of cheap prices. Paying high salaries will increase prices that would make these businesses compete with regular restaurants and may discourage those of limited income from becoming customers.

These businesses also offer many young people an opportunity to enter the workplace and learn what the future will demand as employees.

So, this boycott, if successful, might result in their employers' businesses failing and the employees losing their jobs, putting them at the bottom of the food chain — something they may find hard to swallow.

Dan Reeping


Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Can’t believe ATI statements
  2. ‘Normal’ pitfalls
  3. WQED beyond repair?
  4. Data misrepresented
  5. Updated paving needed