You know those self-checkout machines at stores like CVS, Giant Eagle and Ikea? They're symbolic of the relationship between improved technology and unemployment: Find a way to do more with less and you've got more people with less to do.
The mix of high school graduates and dropouts, college graduates and laid-off employees fighting for the same jobs isn't something you or I can do anything about tomorrow, but the ways in which we're becoming victims of our own success is something worth thinking about before it becomes unmistakably clear.
What concerns me is that when I read literature or listen to talks discussing the factors contributing to unemployment, the labor redundancy created by technological innovation is often left out.
The answers elude me, but I would feel better if more people were talking about it.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Appalling advice
- LCB: Asset to modernize
- Wrong on immigration I
- Wrong on immigration II
- PNC: New roles for helpers
- ATI’s broken promises
- Incumbents’ edge?
- Protesters not law-abiding
- Cops usually not problem
- A buck to pass?
- ‘Affordable’? Not for him