Give up motorcycles
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Sept. 6, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
Why do people continue to ride motorcycles? Thousands of Americans die every year driving one of these death traps.
The insurance companies don't mind the no-helmet laws. That's because it's cheaper for them to have a biker die in an accident than be seriously injured or become disabled. Most of us know people who have been hurt or died in a motorcycle accident, so this really hits home.
Some people think that driving a motorcycle is a really cool thing to do. It boosts their egos or self-confidence, or they tell you it feels good driving through the wind. But is it worth your limbs or your life? Talk to a deceased biker's family members. They'll tell you ego-boosts and being free in the wind were not worth a life. The families suffer every day.
If bikers won't quit for themselves, then they should do it for their daughters, mothers, brothers, fathers and other loved ones.
And drivers, please watch out for bikers. We all need to be extra careful when we see or hear a motorcycle coming our way. Remember, that biker might be someone in your family or a dear friend. Be assured they're somebody's loved one.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Our nation’s testing obsession
- Obstacles to hiring
- Putin’s actions II
- Putin’s actions I
- Math in common?
- Not reviled abroad
- Ukraine & history
- He’ll be missed
- Lebo’s coyotes