By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Sept. 6, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
Regarding the article published Aug. 28 about the Upper Tyrone Township meeting on the sewage project:
Twelve years ago, my husband and I were in the process of selling our house in Bullskin Township when the sewage-line project ran down our street, Moyer Road. Your article suggests no one wants to talk about the cost for a very good reason. We were required 12 years ago to pay a $2,000 tap-in fee. The new owners had to pay to have the property dug up eight to 10 feet down from the back of the house and around to the front of the house, where the new sewage line ran. I am all but certain it cost them, 12 years ago, the same $2,000 to do that.
So, residents of Upper Tyrone Township, get ready to pay at the minimum $4,000 plus inflation over the past 12 years plus a monthly sewage bill for the rest of your home-owning lives. My husband and I are now residents of Kingview Road, are not entitled to financial aid and cannot afford a quick $4,000 to $5,000 bill. How about you?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ukraine & history
- Funding priorities questioned
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Proven success
- Stalin, Hitler, now Putin
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Drought answer?
- Sovereignty trampled
- Apollo-Ridge excellence
- Orwellian redefinitions