Published: Monday, Sept. 2, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
I sometimes wonder if Martin Luther King III read or listened to his father's “I have a dream” speech.
Mr. King and others claim we have a “long way still to go.” To exactly where? Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. believed each individual, regardless of color, has the opportunity to succeed.
The outcome would not be hindered by prejudice but only by an individual's talents and ability to achieve.
I wonder WWMLKD? (What would Martin Luther King do?)
I have a dream he would be the voice in the black community sounding the alarm about single parenthood and poverty. He would also challenge black men in the drug trade and others shirking responsibility. He would challenge the media and celebrities for trying to exploit young people with hedonism and a lack of spiritual values.
Fifty years later, he would have said: You have the freedom and it is up to you to live the dream in love and not blame others.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Forcing their beliefs
- Valid comparison?
- Nukes, not hoops
- ‘Knockout’ evil
- Fearful homogenization
- Eagles’ plight
- Moving in right direction
- More overreach
- Us & them
- Unconstitutional funding
- Obama’s lies