By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Sept. 5, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Why the sudden outrage over the recent MTV Video Music Awards show?
I realized in 1982 that MTV had already crossed the red line. We had finally gotten cable, and my 10- and 14-year-olds' eyes were popping at a video featuring close-ups of someone's gyrating breasts in low-cut attire with messages written in marker on them.
I was told my only option was to give up the long-awaited cable and go back to “rabbit ears.”
So, we've progressed. Nowadays, my 2- and 3-year-old granddaughters know the lyrics and love to dance to Carly Rae Jepsen's “Call Me Maybe” and other music videos.
Recently watching Fox News while my 7-year-old grandson did his homework, I repeatedly shielded the screen as it showed the Miley Cyrus footage from the MTV awards show over and over.
If we haven't cared enough to do something in all this time, does anyone think we will hit the reset button now?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- About U.S. media
- Obstacles to hiring
- Medicaid’s future
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Drought answer?
- Apollo-Ridge excellence
- Orwellian redefinitions
- Keep Laurel Point
- Funding priorities questioned