TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Head Start successful

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Letter to the Editor
Sunday, Sept. 8, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
 

Head Start's goal is “to boost the school readiness of low-income children.” The editorial “Those Head Start cuts: The problem is?” (Aug. 24 and TribLIVE.com) cites a study that concluded Head Start met that goal by significantly improving preschool outcomes. The editorial points out that when assessed at third grade, the general finding was that non-Head Start participants caught up to the Head Start participants. An important exception was that the positive impact of Head Start on young children from high-risk families was sustained through third grade.

Research has also documented long-term benefits from Head Start in school and afterward. Those benefits include an increase in school completion, greater earnings for Head Start alumni and less crime.

The editorial concludes that Head Start programs are a failure, deceive parents and should be eliminated because of the third-grade performance findings.

Head Start parents probably consider Head Start successful, knowing their children are more likely to be ready for school, graduate from high school, earn more money when they go to work and are less likely to commit crimes. Rather than feeling deceived, these parents probably lament the sequestration cuts to Head Start while the editorial applauds those Head Start cuts.

Ray Firth

The writer is policy initiatives director in the University of Pittsburgh's Office of Child Development.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. ATI unfair
  2. Now welcome at VFW
  3. Anatomy of the pension fiasco
  4. Shine light on union pacts’ terms
  5. Narcan’s risks
  6. Bright lines: Confederate battle flag
  7. Shutoff can be used to cut off
  8. No concessions by ATI top management
  9. Sick days’ misuse
  10. Burden eased
  11. Why link shale gas, education?