Violent images & crime
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Sunday, Sept. 15, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Recently, two people in Nevada, members of a group designated terrorist by the FBI, were charged with planning ghastly attacks on police. Two other “sovereign citizen” followers shot and killed two police officers in Arkansas before police killed them in 2010.
I believe it is well past time that we support the police much more strongly. We need them more than ever, and they need us.
The jobs of police are more difficult, and risks to us higher, I am convinced, because the incessant images of violence on television and in movies are ever more powerful, more meticulously — to me, insidiously — produced. And of course they are now watched on giant screens in high definition.
Kids see many thousands of images of violence and murder, to say nothing of violent video games and more graphic depictions of terror and horror. And we wonder why kids attack other kids and post the assaults online.
Violence has become a movie and television pathology. Those responsible for producing and broadcasting it are a disgrace. The images disturb young minds — they are an abuse of our kids. They incite violence-prone youth and adults.
They have, I am convinced, increased the horrendous crimes we now constantly see in this once civilized society.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Obstacles to hiring
- Putin’s actions II
- Putin’s actions I
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Math in common?
- Our nation’s testing obsession
- Guzzardi for guv
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Telling quotes
- Lebo’s coyotes