Compensate organ-donor families
I found the article “Organ donations can be life-savers, money-makers” (Sept. 1) informative and appalling at the same time.
People who donate their organs so others might live do it with the belief that it is a brave and honorable thing to do. I think it is disgusting that some supposed charities make a huge profit off of a donor's body parts. And the executives of these procurement organizations make over $300,000 and sell organs such as a heart or lungs for more than $30,000. But the family of the donor gets nothing. The donor's family is faced with a hospital bill and the cost of a funeral.
A donor's family should at least have the hospital bill and the funeral paid for by the procurement organization. We need some kind of regulation by the state to make sure that the families of donors are compensated. There would be more organ donations if there was some compensation involved.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Biased? Guilty as charged
- It’s not personal
- ‘Food fight’ lamentable
- Unhappy returns
- UMW fighting EPA regulations