By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, Sept. 7, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Our country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles. Our laws include that we are innocent until proven guilty.
I am my brother's keeper (Genesis). Do unto to others as you would have them do unto you (Matthew 7:12). Are these just platitudes? Should the United States stick its nose into the problems of Syria?
In Iraq and Afghanistan over the past 10 years, indigenous people we were there to protect, and to work with, maliciously misled us. We were given information that caused us to use our troops and drone program to kill these people's rivals, their enemies. Did our NSA and CIA knowingly approve and encourage this? Are we repeating this mistake in Syria? Are we being used as pawns of others?
Yes, children and adults were killed in Syria, and sarin gas was used; these are facts and truths. Did President Assad authorize the use of sarin? Did he authorize one of his subordinates to use sarin? Unknown.
How can we be a credible brother's keeper if we attack, kill and maim the wrong people?
Raymond J. Borkoski
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Budget & business taxes
- Telling facts
- Strong enough
- Invest in pre-K
- Backing sheriff
- Drought answer?
- Not reviled abroad
- Corbett’s choice
- Islam & women