Stick to FACS
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, Sept. 7, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
I'm beginning my 10th enjoyable year as a middle school teacher of family and consumer science — previously known as home economics.
So many school districts are discontinuing or cutting back this program of what people generally think of as just cooking and sewing, But it is much more and not that simple.
The FACS department incorporates higher-level thinking, decision-making, evaluation and reasoning, writing development and grammar, math and geometry, social skills working with a group and performing individually within a group setting. This incorporation of core and social curriculum takes many forms in the different areas of cooking, sewing, child care, family dynamics and financial literacy.
FACS requires a lot of prep time just for the basic topics. There's additional planning of core and social curriculums, and we spend a lot of time grading for accuracy in writing, grammar and math. This is well worth our efforts. Students ask, “Why are we doing this in cooking and sewing?” Yet I know these are requirements for excelling at any job.
Our efforts in FACS filter into our personal lives and aid in creating productive and sound workers who contribute to business, the community and our society. Our middle school's PSSA writing scores jumped last year, and I believe the FACS teachers' focus on writing contributed to that.
We demonstrate to students how to apply core subjects to their future lives so they will have fulfilling lives.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Saved her life
- Fix icy hazard on Rt. 66
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Not reviled abroad
- Wildlife & humans
- Quit drilling in state forests
- We pay to keep poor warm
- Conspicuous by absence
- Weakness shows
- Needs sign added