Pay gap real
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Monday, Sept. 9, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Pay gap real
In response to the “This Just In” item headlined “77 cents on dollar for women? It's a myth, author says” in the Trib's Sept. 3 print edition: Pay disparity between men and women is not a myth — it is a real issue that is being resolved by a combination of activism and market forces.
Until the 1970s, women were paid less for doing the exact same work as their male counterparts. Gloria Steinem and other activists brought this issue to national consciousness, which inspired many companies to change their attitudes — and their policies — toward female employees. Women also began to enter more male-dominated fields, which further enabled women's earning power.
Although the study by Atlantic editor Hanna Rosin states that the pay gap between the genders is narrower than previously assumed — which is a wonderful sign of progress — this issue is no less real. Instead of trivializing this issue, perhaps people could celebrate the progress women have made in respect to economic independence.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Fix icy hazard on Rt. 66
- We pay to keep poor warm
- Saved her life
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Tarentum’s ‘questionable practices’
- Drought answer?
- Conspicuous by absence
- Apollo-Ridge excellence
- Enslaving themselves
- Stalin, Hitler, now Putin