Spinal cord injuries
Spinal cord injuries
September is National Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Month, and there are 1.25 million Americans living with spinal cord injuries — including me.
Due to an unfortunate, sports-related injury at the age of 19, I have been confined to an electric wheelchair ever since. My spinal cord injury changed my life permanently and affected many others close to me.
Sadly, every 48 minutes another person will become paralyzed. This is simply unacceptable.
Unfortunately, federal and private funding for scientific research has been dramatically reduced. We need to bring the devastation paralysis causes to the forefront of public awareness. The public needs to understand how close the scientific community is to developing new therapies that one day will allow us to live without any physical limitations.
Scientists are closer than ever to finding a cure. The FDA has approved the world's only Phase 1 human clinical trial testing a cellular therapy on people with spinal cord injuries. The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis is leading this ground-breaking research.
During this month, I hope people will remember the struggles those of us who are paralyzed confront on a daily basis and consider donating to organizations that will allow millions of us to live normal lives again without the limitations resulting from spinal cord injury.
Brian R. Jacob
The writer is president/CEO of WESTARM Therapy and Homecare Inc.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pedro must go
- Steel at stake, too
- Duty to disclose
- Oberdorf firing
- Not taxpayers’ responsibility
- Don’t blame bus drivers I
- Good riddance
- Reverse red-kettle ban I
- Reverse red-kettle ban II