We're all aware of the problems caused by alcohol — addiction, DUI, domestic incidents, etc. Now there is a push to legalize marijuana. Why, oh why, would you want to compound the addiction problems we already have with yet more of the same type of problem?
Are you any less dead if you're killed by someone “high as a kite” as opposed to someone “drunk as a skunk”?
Parents, do you want someone using marijuana to drive your child's school bus?
Do you want the dentist giving you a root canal to be on drugs? The surgeon doing your knee replacement, the guy installing your new gas line, the druggist filling your prescription?
Think of how many people you and your family interact with each and every day. Any of them and their actions can have consequences for your loved ones.
Wouldn't you rather they were of sound mind and clear-headed when in contact with you?
It's bad enough that many people are using marijuana illegally. Legalize it, and you will only add to the growing number of irresponsible, self-serving people who don't care about anything but their own pleasures.
Isn't it time to halt the decline of moral standards in this country and strive to reverse this destructive path?
This country is sinking lower and lower in standards, and you are the only ones who can stop it.
There are so many ways people hurt each other already. Why would you want to add another way?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Gun questions for mayor I
- Shame on Wolf
- Wolf is the right choice
- Gun questions for mayor II
- ObamaCare solution
- Wrong on EPA water proposal
- Making it special
- Corbett, not Wolf
- Embrace domestic energy production
- Good ‘friends,’ good food
- An Obama clone